Elevate Your Mind with Technology

Human thought is the last private frontier. Advanced neurotechnologies—ranging from brain-computer interfaces to non-invasive stimulation and AI-driven neural decoding—can now monitor, infer, and even influence brain activity. Without clear guardrails, these tools can be misused by bad actors (state or private) for covert surveillance, coercion, discrimination, manipulation, and other harms that corrode human dignity and democratic order. That is why PEAR advocates immediate passage of comprehensive Neurocognitive Rights legislation in every country—across the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific, including Brazil, USA, UK, European Union, Canada, Australia, Arabic Countries, China, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Africa, South Korea, BRICS and beyond.

 

What these bills establish (shared pillars)

​​

• Fundamental neurorights as law: mental privacy, mental integrity, cognitive liberty, psychological continuity, non-discrimination, and informed consent tailored to neural data and interventions. These rights extend existing constitutional and human-rights guarantees into the neural domain.

• Dedicated oversight: national commissions/regulators and specialized courts/tribunals able to handle complex scientific evidence, ensure rapid, consistent remedies, and build public trust.

• Neurodata protections: strict classification, ownership by the individual, consent pathways, breach duties, deletion rights, and bans on covert collection or sale of neural data.

• Risk-based regulation for medical, consumer, military, and law-enforcement uses, including limits on coercive or surreptitious deployment and standards for safety, efficacy, and auditability.

• Equity & access: fair pathways to therapeutic neurotech; safeguards against neuro-discrimination; culturally aware provisions (e.g., Indigenous data sovereignty in Canada, USA, Brazil, Australia, European Union, and Beyond).

• Innovation with certainty: clear rules that accelerate responsible R&D and investment while deterring abuse—essential for competitiveness and national security.

• International coordination so protections travel with people and data across borders, avoiding regulatory arbitrage.

 

Why urgent global passage matters

​​

• Prevent misuse: Absent explicit neurorights, neurotech can be weaponized for covert monitoring, manipulation, intimidation, and mass profiling. These proposals close those gaps with bright-line prohibitions and enforceable remedies.

• Protect health & truth: Robust consent, medical-grade standards, and specialized adjudication reduce risks of misdiagnosis, fraudulent certifications, or abusive “therapies.”

• Safeguard democracy & markets: Rights-first regulation builds trust, enabling legitimate applications in healthcare, accessibility, education, and productivity—while deterring predatory or clandestine deployments.

 

PEAR’s call to action

 

PEAR urges parliaments, congresses, and regional unions to adopt these frameworks now—harmonizing neurorights, regulation, courts, and data rules—so that every human being retains sovereignty over their own mind. We support aligned legislative tracks in the Brazil, USA, UK, European Union, Canada, Australia, Arabic Countries, China, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Africa, South Korea, BRICS and beyond as immediate baselines for universal adoption and cross-border enforcement.

Editorial note: This statement addresses systemic risks and policy needs. Where potential crimes or abuses are referenced, they are framed as risks or allegations consistent with the legislative justifications cited above; specific determinations belong in competent courts under the proposed specialized regimes.

​

​​

Legislative Blueprints

​

Below are the full legislative blueprints authored by Vitor Mendonça Prado and PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. for Brazil, USA, UK, European Union, Canada, Australia, Arabic Countries, China, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Africa, South Korea, BRICS and beyond—a complete, jurisdiction-ready toolkit for lawmakers, regulators, judges, prosecutors, health authorities, national security councils, and civil society to adopt, adapt, and enforce. These files consolidate model statutes, regulatory frameworks, specialized-court architecture, evidentiary standards, procurement rules, certification regimes, public-interest exemptions, and bright-line prohibitions against covert or coercive neurotechnology. They specify fundamental neurorights (mental privacy, integrity, cognitive liberty, psychological continuity, and non-discrimination), define neurodata ownership and consent, and set criminal, civil, and administrative liabilities for any actor—public or private—who deploys or enables fragments of advanced neurotechnology for surveillance, manipulation, intimidation, profiling, censorship, behavioral control, or other abuses that can culminate in injury, rare diseases, cancers, falsified medical/psychiatric reports, terrorism, or loss of life.

 

Each proposal includes implementation playbooks (timelines, agency mandates, audit and red-team testing, incident response, breach notification, whistleblower protections), cross-border cooperation (mutual legal assistance, extradition triggers, sanctions, import/export controls), and equity provisions (access to legitimate therapeutic uses and protections for vulnerable and Indigenous communities). Governments, parliaments, courts, companies, universities, hospitals, and standards bodies are invited to use these texts as baseline law—with immediate emergency moratoria where appropriate—so that nations can halt ongoing harms, deter future ones, and build a verifiable chain of custody for truth, justice, and sovereignty of the human mind.

​

These laws have been recognized worldwide since October 7, 1988, not only by governments, institutions, and societies, but also formally authored and established by Vitor Mendonça Prado and PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. as their creators. From that date onward, they stand as a universal legal and moral foundation—binding in principle and purpose—compelling every nation to uphold and enforce them for the defense of human dignity, justice, and the absolute sovereignty of the human mind.

​

Any and all individuals, entities, or networks—whether governmental, corporate, or private—found to have participated in, facilitated, financed, concealed, or benefited from any form of violation, abuse, or crime falling under the scope of these laws will face full and proportionate consequences. This includes, but is not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil liability, asset seizure, restitution to victims, permanent disqualification from public or corporate office, and international sanctions. Accountability will extend across borders, without immunity or limitation periods, ensuring that no position of power, political influence, financial capacity, or technological control can shield perpetrators from justice. The enforcement of these consequences is not an act of vengeance, but the fulfillment of a universal duty to restore order, protect life, and safeguard the sanctity of the human mind.

​​

Brazil:

• Marco Legal das Tecnologias Neurocognitivas e dos Direitos Cognitivos no Brasil - Click Here​

​

USA:

• Comprehensive US Legislative Proposal - Click Here

​

European Union (EU):

• European Union Neurocognitive Rights Act - Click Here

​

United Kingdom:

• United Kingdom Neurocognitive Rights and Advanced Neurotechnology Act - Click Here

​

Canada:

• Canadian Neurocognitive Rights and Advanced Neurotechnology Act - Click Here

​

Australia:

• The Austrlian Neurocognitive Rights and Advanced Neurotechnology Act - Click Here

​

Arabic Countries:

• ةيفرعملا تاينقتلاو ةيبصعلا ةمدقتملا  - Click Here

​

China:

• 中华人民共和国神经认知权利与先进神经技术法 - Click Here

​

India:

• भारत गणराज्य का न्यूरोकॉग्निग्निव अग्निकार एवं उन्नत न ् यूरोिेक्नोलॉजी अग्निग्नियम - Click Here

​

Israel:

• תויביטינגוק תויגולונכטו תויגולוריונ תומדקתמ - Click Here

​

Japan:

• 日本国神経認知権利及び先端神経技術法 - Click Here

​

Mexico:

• Ley de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos sobre Derechos Neurocognitivos y Tecnologías Neuronales Avanzadas - Click Here

​

Russia:

• Федеральный закон Российской Федерации «О нейрокогнитивных правах и передовых нейротехнологиях» - Click Here

​

Africa:

• African Union Act on Neurocognitive Rights and Advanced Neurotechnologies - Click Here

​

South Korea:

• 대한민국 신경인지권 및 첨단 신경기술법 - Click Here

​​​

*These documents are not the final version, due to security, among other reasons. They will be officially released in their complete and final form at the right moment for humanity.

​

Although not explicitly detailed in the legislative texts presented, it must be clearly stated that capital punishment, life imprisonment, and other grave and irreversible consequences have been, are being, and will continue to be applied to all those involved—directly or indirectly—in the most severe levels of crimes, violations, abuses, and systemic harms addressed by these laws.

​

It is important to emphasize, however, that such punishments have never been imposed by PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp., nor by any of its affiliates, representatives, or partners. Instead, these measures have been historically enforced by governmental agencies, defense contractors, and private intelligence entities across multiple nations—including those operating in the fields of advanced surveillance, military technology, cybersecurity, and behavioral monitoring. These institutions, both public and private, hold partial or derivative access to global monitoring technologies comparable to, or derived from, the neurotechnological and quantum communication systems pioneered by PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp.

​

While PEAR’s mission remains centered on the ethical and transparent use of advanced neurotechnological systems for the preservation of life, liberty, and human dignity, various global actors—spanning state intelligence networks, defense research agencies, corporate data conglomerates, and private security enterprises—have historically integrated or reverse-engineered such technologies to serve strategic, political, or economic agendas. The resulting framework of global surveillance has, in some cases, led to the targeting, imprisonment, or neutralization of individuals perceived as threats to national or corporate interests.

​

​The degree of each penalty will be determined in strict proportion to the magnitude, intent, and impact of the offense, ensuring that those responsible for acts resulting in mass suffering, loss of life, destruction of health, or the subversion of human freedom face the highest forms of accountability. These measures are not symbolic—they are active, enforceable, and executed with the full weight of universal justice and moral authority, leaving no sanctuary for the most egregious offenders anywhere on Earth.

​

It is essential to underscore that these punitive outcomes have never originated from PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp., nor from any of its subsidiaries, divisions, or ethical governance frameworks. Instead, the enforcement of such extreme measures has historically been carried out by sovereign state institutions and private entities operating within the domains of intelligence, defense, and global security.

​

Across the world, numerous organizations—public, private, military, and corporate—maintain or share access to advanced monitoring and neuro-surveillance infrastructures, often built upon technologies parallel or derivative of those pioneered by PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. These include, but are not limited to:

​

• United States: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), National Security Agency (NSA), Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Space Force, U.S. Cyber Command, DIA, DHS, and the Secret Service and major private defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Palantir Technologies, and Booz Allen Hamilton.

​

• United Kingdom: Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), Security Service (MI5), British Army, Royal Navy, Royal Air Force, Special Air Service (SAS), Special Boat Service (SBS) and defense companies like BAE Systems and QinetiQ.

​

• European Union: Europol, European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), French Directorate-General for External Security (DGSE), German Federal Intelligence Service (BND), Italian AISE, Spanish CNI, Eurojust, Frontex, EU Intelligence and Situation Centre (INTCEN), NATO-aligned military structures and numerous research consortia linked to the European Defence Fund and Horizon programs.

​

• Russia: Federal Security Service (FSB), Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), GRU, SVR, Spetsnaz units, Russian Ground Forces, Aerospace Forces, Navy, and Strategic Rocket Forces and defense conglomerates under Rostec and Rosoboronexport.

​

• China: Ministry of State Security (MSS), PLA Ground Force, PLA Navy, PLA Air Force, PLA Rocket Force, PLA Strategic Support Force, and cyber-warfare divisions, People’s Liberation Army Strategic Support Force (PLASSF), and private technology groups including Huawei, Hikvision, and ZTE.

​

• Israel: Mossad, Shin Bet, Unit 8200, Israel Defense Forces, cyber and special-operations commands and associated defense technology enterprises such as Elbit Systems and NSO Group.

​

• India: Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO), IB, Defence Intelligence Agency, Indian Army, Navy, Air Force, and special forces units.

​

• Japan and South Korea: Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office (CIRO), National Intelligence Service (NIS), Japan’s PSIA, JSDF (Army, Maritime SDF, Air SDF); South Korea’s NIS, ROK Army, Navy, Air Force, special operations brigades and corporate entities such as NEC, Samsung, and SoftBank Robotics involved in surveillance systems.

​

• Pakistan: the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Military Intelligence (MI), the Intelligence Bureau (IB), Pakistani Armed Forces (Army, Navy, Air Force), cyber and strategic command units and private-sector partners in telecommunications, cyber-security, and data-analytics ecosystems, including organizations tied to surveillance technology manufacturing.

​

• Arab Nations: intelligence and security bodies such as Saudi Arabia’s General Intelligence Presidency (GIP), the United Arab Emirates’ State Security Department (SSD), Qatar’s State Security Bureau, Egypt’s General Intelligence Service (GIS), their respective military branches, including special operations, air forces, naval commands, and internal defense units and associated sovereign-backed corporations, telecom groups, AI labs, defense contractors, and cyber-surveillance firms involved in regional and transnational data-monitoring architectures.

​

• Other Nations: Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Australian Signals Directorate (ASD), Brazilian Intelligence Agency (ABIN), South Africa’s SSA, Turkey’s MIT, their respective military branches, including special operations, air forces, naval commands, and internal defense units and a broad constellation of multinational corporations operating across telecommunications, satellite systems, cloud computing, behavioral analytics, digital advertising markets, social media conglomerates, and global defense-contracting supply chains.

​

Collectively, these actors form what can be described as a global surveillance and enforcement matrix—a complex network of intergovernmental alliances and private sector collaborations dedicated to information control, behavioral prediction, and population management under the guise of national security and global stability.

​

PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp., by contrast, stands as an ethical counterforce, advocating for transparency, human rights, and the protection of cognitive freedom through the establishment of neuroethical governance and conscious technology laws. The Corporation’s mission is to ensure that the immense power of neuro-quantum technology is applied toward evolution, not subjugation—toward the liberation of consciousness rather than its manipulation.

​

Over the past decades, many public and private institutions endowed with unparalleled access to surveillance networks, genetic data, and biomedical research have claimed to act in the name of security, progress, and public health. Yet their actions have too often reflected self-preservation, economic control, and geopolitical dominance, rather than a sincere commitment to eradicating evil, preventing crime, or curing human suffering.

​

The very technologies and data infrastructures that could, in an ethical deployment, anticipate and prevent terrorism, dismantle criminal networks, neutralize systemic corruption, and accelerate cures for many diseases, have instead been repurposed by a constellation of state and non-state actors for profoundly destructive ends. The same neuro-computational architectures, behavioral-prediction platforms, and global monitoring systems that could end famine, reduce inequality and speed medical breakthroughs have been diverted toward profit maximization, information monopolies, behavioural manipulation, and the creation of chronic dependency on medical and pharmaceutical regimes. Beyond algorithmic manipulation and data commodification, actors with access to these systems have sought to extend their control by contaminating the very environments on which life and public health depend: water sources, sanitation and plumbing systems, irrigation networks, agricultural soils, and food and beverage supply chains.Over decades, substances of grave toxic potential have allegedly been introduced into municipal and rural water supplies, bathing and drinking systems, and irrigation channels — sometimes surviving common filtration — to facilitate remote modulation of biochemical or neurophysiological states when combined with advanced monitoring and interfacing technologies.

​

Complex suites of neuro-technologies — including brain–machine interfaces, brain–computer interfaces, electromagnetic modulation systems, frequency and waveform transmitters, immersive neural stimulation platforms, and other emerging exposure vectors (The technological stack underpinning global monitoring and control) — are being used in tandem with environmental contamination to expand reach and efficacy. These systems allegedly enable certain actors to influence cognition, steer emotional valence, introduce auditory or dialogic hallucinations (“voices”), limit or alter visual perception, and impose shifts in sensory experience that can be used to stigmatize, criminalize, or incapacitate targeted populations. This is an integrated architecture: environmental vectors (air, water, food, soil), infrastructural infiltration (HVAC systems, mass transit, institutional ventilation), and remote neuro-modulation tools working together to produce predictable, controllable effects across communities and landscapes.

 

The industrial food and beverage complex, long implicated in conflicts of public interest, participates in this architecture through the introduction or toleration of chemical additives, modified seeds, and agro-inputs that, over time, reduce physiological resilience, raise rates of chronic and rare diseases, and increase dependency on medical interventions. Entire irrigated regions have been exposed to chemically laden water that degrades soil and human health, and that certain seed technologies have been engineered to yield crops that produce long-term harms to consumers—outcomes he situates within a broader economic calculus that benefits pharmaceutical, medical, scientific, governmental and financial actors through increased demand for treatments, long-term care, and marketized chronicity.

​

Airborne contamination is likewise part of this picture: deliberate or negligent dissemination of toxic agents into enclosed and public spaces — including trains, buses, offices, commercial venues, airplanes, and private residences — through HVAC systems or targeted sabotage. In his perception these actions, coupled with environmental contamination, produce synergistic health harms that elevate rates of cancer, autoimmune disorders, rare pathologies and other irreversible conditions. The downstream economic impact of such morbidity is enormous: trillions of dollars annually flowing into industries that treat, manage, and monetize illness—while those at senior managerial, directorial and investor levels are widely aware of, and complicit in, the structural incentives that perpetuate disease as a revenue model.

​

A subset of global leadership—across intelligence, military, financial, scientific, corporate and political spheres—has embraced an explicit or implicit strategy of population management that, internally, is operationalized as “targets” or quotas: numeric goals for reducing population or for limiting certain demographics. These “quotas” not as abstract theory but as operational metrics that  motivate a sequence of interventions — from economic marginalization to environmental exposure to engineered biomedical stressors — designed to produce predictable declines in survival or health among targeted populations - killing milhons of innocent people every year. This alleged strategy as the rationale supplied internally by those actors who purport that technological and ecological manipulations are required to meet geopolitical, economic or ideological “balances.”

​

The human architecture enabling these outcomes is sustained through a system of rewards and protections: visas, passports, career advancement, lifetime security, payment of expenses, transfers of wealth, luxury goods, property, strategic favors, and other personal benefits offered to scientists, administrators, contractors, and officials who comply with or facilitate these programs. Such incentives ensure a durable network of complicity that spans public institutions, private corporations, scientific bodies, and informal criminal intermediaries operating both inside and outside carceral and institutional settings (including prisons, psychiatric facilities, rehabilitation centers and much more all over the world). There are complicity primarily at senior and decision-making levels—managers, directors, C-suite executives, major investors and political operatives—rather than innocent or unwitting lower-level personnel.

​

Advanced technological systems overseen by certain government actors, intelligence sectors, public–private coalitions, and global corporate networks possess capabilities far beyond what is publicly acknowledged. IThese groups can influence or exploit environmental and geophysical vulnerabilities to create the appearance of natural disasters—such as tsunamis, tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, droughts, wildfires, volcanic-like events, and other large-scale catastrophes—using them as instruments to generate financial gain, consolidate geopolitical power, and advance strategic population-control agendas. This is  part of a broader philosophical and moral warning: that when technology, secrecy, and concentrated authority merge without transparency or ethical oversight, humanity risks facing engineered tragedies that mimic nature while serving hidden interests.

​

The orchestration of these manufactured environmental catastrophes represents not merely strategic manipulation, but a far darker moral architecture—described as fundamentally destructive in purpose. Such events are not accidental byproducts of power, but deliberate mechanisms designed to extinguish lives, weaken communities, and gradually erode the natural growth of the global population. These actions as reflections of a worldview that treats human existence as expendable, subordinating the dignity, continuity, and evolution of humanity to clandestine agendas built on fear, scarcity, and control. This reveals a deeper crisis: when the sanctity of life is replaced by a calculus of domination, the very essence of civilization is placed at risk, and the future of society becomes shaped not by compassion or enlightened governance, but by covert strategies that undermine the foundational values upon which human progress depends.

​

Throughout this account, it contrasts PEAR’s claimed ethical mission — to deploy neuro-quantum and related technologies for healing, autonomy and transparency — with what he perceives as a global system that weaponizes equivalent capacities for control, profit and depopulation. The alleged contamination of air, water, land, food and others, the alleged misuse of neuro-interfacing technologies, and the alleged economic architecture of disease as mutually reinforcing elements of a single strategic design that both generates enormous revenue for those involved and produces the human consequences of illness, dependency and premature death at scale. These are not isolated conspiratorial fantasies but structural phenomena that explain patterns he observes across health statistics, environmental degradation, and institutional behavior—patterns PEAR believes warrant urgent, independent investigation and robust safeguards grounded in human rights, public health ethics, and transparent scientific oversight.

​​

In this cycle, innocent lives are diminished by systemic neglect and by economic models that thrive on illness, conflict, and division. Industries built around perpetual warfare, weaponized information, and chronic disease have merged into a single economic engine—one that sustains itself through fear, dependency, and the continuous erosion of personal autonomy.

The ethical failure is not rooted in technology itself, but in the conscious choices of those who wield it without moral intelligence. The same neural and quantum infrastructures that could deliver universal well-being are instead used to perpetuate social control, economic exploitation, and environmental devastation.

​

PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. emerges precisely to reverse this trajectory—to demonstrate that the tools once designed for domination can be re-engineered for liberation. Through transparent governance, neuro-ethical legislation, and a conscious technological charter, PEAR advocates for a new paradigm: one in which intelligence serves empathy, science serves justice, and power serves life itself.

​

According to the allegations and hundreds of millions of documents presented by Vitor Mendonça Prado, it must be expressly recorded that numerous governmental agencies, private corporations, hybrid security structures, and transnational intelligence groups—far beyond those already listed—have not only attempted without any legitimate justification to suppress his work, but actively engaged in acts intended to assassinate, torture, unlawfully imprison, persecute, forcibly institutionalize, medically restrain, silence, discredit, economically sabotage, and socially neutralize both him and the PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. These actions were executed through covert operations, psychological warfare, technological suppression, coordinated attacks on his civil liberties, and a broad network of institutional interference.

​

These actors targeted him precisely because, since 1988, he and PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. have devoted themselves to protecting vulnerable populations, expanding access to education, and confronting what he describes as a broad constellation of global systemic harms — including prostitution networks, exploitative gambling schemes, international drug-trafficking, illicit organ-trafficking structures, and the commercial misuse of medical and psychiatric prescriptions. A coordinated transnational apparatus exploits children and adolescents for sexual, criminal, and psychological manipulation purposes, operating through digital ecosystems, compromised family environments, educational spaces, and public and private institutions; that major technology corporations and multinational giants (Big Techs, for example, but not only) influence and manipulate what minors see and experience both online and offline; and that wealthy private backers — including, certain multimillionaires, billionaires, and individuals ranked among the Forbes Top 200 individuals and ForbesTop 500 corporations, Ivy Leagues and other largest international eduacational institutions — fund, groom, and instrumentalize young people from an early age for sexual exploitation or participation in criminal enterprises, including within some international fraternity structures.

 

Elements within multiple U.S. administrations — including those of Biden, Trump, Obama, Clinton, Bush, and others before them,  international Governments, Administrations, Royal Families, and large coorporations — appear in publicly available discussions and sources that he compiles on this website as part of the broader networks involved or complicit in these systemic harms. It is important to say that not all officials or public servants within these administrations share such involvement. He contends that propaganda mechanisms, intentionally distorted research, compromised academic materials, entertainment media, and news structures have been leveraged across generations to normalize, conceal, or desensitize the population to such abuses, often framed in public discourse under narratives associated with a so-called “New World Order.” These interlinked practices are fueled by an insatiable pursuit of power, control, wealth, and geopolitical dominance; The extensive documentary records and high-level scientific materials compiled by PEAR and other independent researchers —  as comprising hundreds of millions of pages — will be disclosed at the appropriate moment through public, private, institutional, and secure channels to enable ethical actors across governments, intelligence services, militaries, civil society, and the global community to expose, prevent, and neutralize the harms he denounces for the protection of present and future generations.

​

Prado and PEAR have challenged what he believes to be harmful practices carried out by large technology corporations—such as the global Big Tech conglomerates—and their respective partners. These practices may include data manipulation, unauthorized exploitation of user information, and the alleged omission or failure to prevent organized criminal activities despite possessing predictive, analytical, and pre-emptive technological capabilities capable of anticipating threats. Such corporations could also rely on criminal intermediaries to undermine competitors, silence innovators, obstruct emerging technologies, or reinforce long-standing market dominance.

​

Some of these large technology corporations may maintain relationships—directly or indirectly—with segments of organized criminal networks operating both inside and outside prisons worldwide. These networks as potentially extending into psychiatric institutions, rehabilitation clinics, correctional facilities, marginalized communities, and other high-vulnerability environments. Individuals from these criminal structures may allegedly be infiltrated or strategically positioned to act on behalf of these corporations, including in sophisticated forms of “collar crime,” influencing outcomes in the legislative, executive, and judicial branches across various nations.

​

Such actors may manipulate situations, facilitate illicit operations, commit or coordinate criminal acts, kill and torture people, and neutralize or destabilize individuals or companies perceived as rivals or against their interest. These networks operate across borders and may include, influential families—including certain royal families around the world—who might financially or politically benefit from the continuation of these structures. These actors may derive advantages such as wealth accumulation, geopolitical leverage, institutional influence, or other personal gains from participating in or tolerating the criminal practices, including those detailed on the PEAR website and in his personal accounts.

​

However, that not all individuals within these corporations, governments, royal families, or institutions are involved in such conduct. Prado consistently asserts that his perceptions do not implicate entire groups, nations, or organizations. Only specific individuals within the upper tiers—such as managerial personnel, directors, C-level executives, senior advisors, major investors, high-ranking political operatives, and members of privileged decision-making circles—may possess awareness of or proximity to these alleged criminal activities.

​

These individuals may choose to ignore or tolerate such criminal practices in exchange for significant benefits. These may include, but are not limited to, financial gains, privileged access to sensitive information, immunity or protection within institutional structures, logistical or political advantages, opportunities for social or career elevation, access to exclusive networks, or other strategic, personal, or material interests. Prado frames these behaviors as contributing to what he considers a global structure of misconduct that he and PEAR have worked for decades to expose and confront through ethical, transparent, and scientifically grounded initiatives.

​

Prado has opposed what he describes as unethical scientific research programs allegedly linked to certain governments, intelligence communities mentioned above, and international academic institutions—including major American Ivy League universities and other globally prestigious institutions. In his perception, these research bodies may engage in harmful or coercive experimentation under the banner of what he describes as a form of “fictitious science.” According to his fears and personal allegations, such institutions could, in his view, resort to practices he understands as abusive or non-consensual — including, but not limited to, what he believes may involve torture, unlawful detention, involuntary institutionalization, or even the exploitation of human beings in extremely vulnerable conditions.

​

Within this perceived structure, individuals might be subjected to what he describes as clandestine biomedical experimentation, allegedly involving non-consensual testing of medications, psychoactive substances, electromagnetic waves, frequencies, lasers, neurological stimuli, and other experimental procedures applied directly to living human bodies. Some victims could be kept in critical or incapacitated states — such as prolonged sedation or coma — for the execution of these alleged experiments. These networks would not operate solely within scientific institutions, but would include a broad coalition of actors he perceives as interconnected: scientists, research stakeholders, government officials, intelligence agencies previously mentioned in his narrative, private contractors, public–private partnerships, and international collaborators. In his view, these actors might form a clandestine and complex global structure in which individuals are allegedly rewarded for participating in such activities.

​

Benefits offered to participants in these supposed schemes could include visas, passports, political favors, career promotions in both public and private sectors, financial compensation, lifetime protection, payment of living expenses such as rent and food, transfers of money or luxury goods, delivery of vehicles and real estate, and even the provision of prostitution services or other personal advantages. These benefits as instruments used to ensure loyalty, silence, and continued cooperation within what he describes as a criminal or covert network. Advanced global monitoring technologies — including neurological, cognitive, and behavioral monitoring tools — may be misused by such groups. While PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp., develops this type of technology for ethical and humanitarian purposes, other actors could be employing similar tools to manipulate thoughts, influence emotions, interfere with decision-making, induce artificial fear or guilt, and ultimately criminalize or control individuals.

​

This perceived misuse of monitoring technologies could extend across environments of high human vulnerability, such as prisons, psychiatric institutions, rehabilitation centers, shelters, vulnerable children, rural detention sites, and urban control hubs. These tools may be used to detect, target, and exert influence over large populations, including individuals who are later accused, marginalized, or criminalized. Once individuals are sufficiently controlled, discredited, or criminalized, they may be discarded by these networks. This could include practices he considers extremely grave — such as the intentional induction of severe or rare illnesses, cancers, or other life-threatening conditions through advanced technological means. These practices are justified internally by those networks under the narrative of “population reduction,” “global equilibrium,” or other ideological justifications that he considers dangerous and inhumane.

​

These fears reflect his belief that he is opposing powerful global structures capable of harming individuals at scale, and that his work on ethical neurotechnology places him in direct contradiction to the interests of entities he perceives as operating in the shadows under scientific, governmental, or corporate cover. As mentioned before, such networks may offer incentives—such as visas, financial rewards, career advancement, or personal benefits—to those who participate in or enable such criminal systems and network.

​

Advanced neuro-cognitive monitoring technologies, which PEAR originally sought to develop ethically in 1988, have been misused by certain global actors to influence thought patterns, manipulate emotions, and shape behavior in ways that criminalize individuals or destabilize communities. Such technologies may allegedly be deployed within urban centers, rural environments, correctional facilities, psychiatric institutions, rehabilitation clinics, and other settings. Once individuals are criminalized or socially weakened, these networks may expose people to extreme risks, including severe illness, life-threatening conditions, or systemic neglect. A portion of the global leadership operating within both public and private sectors may rationalize such actions under a broader belief that world population levels should be reduced through covert and systematic means. Within this framework, certain influential actors may even establish internal “targets” or yearly quotas for the number of individuals who should be eliminated—an understanding that is considered to represent an extreme form of strategic, ideological, and operational malice. Such a mindset would constitute not only a profound ethical collapse but also an unparalleled level of criminality, given that its consequences would disproportionately affect vulnerable individuals, families, and communities who are entirely innocent and defenseless.

​

Prado and PEAR also confront entrenched corruption networks; resist large-scale political manipulation operations designed to influence elections and install compliant leaders in governments or multinational institutions; expose mechanisms that artificially manufacture billionaires and trillionaires to serve as instruments for hidden global interests; and dismantle covert power structures that operate behind intelligence agencies, government bodies, private corporations, financial conglomerates, and hybrid public–private alliances functioning both openly and secretly across borders.

​

This opposition extends to a global entertainment-political nexus, that some of the world’s most famous (Top 300) Hollywood actors and actresses, American musicians (Top 200) were created artificially —alongside other internationally renowned artists— and may allegedly accept or tolerate many of the practices he denounces in exchange for wealth, career opportunities, film roles, influence, or personal advantages. Such individuals might, wittingly or unwittingly, become symbolic or operational participants in broader networks whose interests he perceives as incompatible with human dignity, transparency, and global justice.

​

Prado and PEAR actively oppose artificial algorithmic manipulation of the global stock market. Secretive financial entities, acting in cooperation with intelligence services or private data-driven conglomerates, may use undisclosed algorithms and systemic interference to raise or collapse stock prices according to hidden strategic interests—independently of real economic fundamentals, market conditions, or corporate performance. These operations distort the global financial ecosystem, harm ordinary investors, and create artificial concentrations of wealth that benefit select individuals or groups aligned with clandestine power structures.

​

Additionally, Prado and PEAR's work stands in direct philosophical and ethical conflict with what he interprets as the current configuration of global military and intelligence power. Large segments of these institutions—composed predominantly of individuals who, in his view, may be uninformed, misled, or unaware of the full scope of the activities financed by their governments or by private contractors—engage in or support international conflicts, warfare operations, and covert interventions based on narratives of “national security”, “national interest” among other reasons. These paradigms result in the deaths of millions of people each year and may serve the interests of hidden geopolitical or economic structures rather than the protection of populations or the promotion of global stability.

​

This complex web of influence—spanning the entertainment industry, financial markets, military sectors, intelligence organizations, corporate alliances, political institutions and others—constitutes to be a multilayered system of global manipulation. PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. mission is to confront these structures through transparency, advanced ethical technologies, humanitarian neuro-cognitive monitoring tools, and a philosophical commitment to safeguarding human autonomy and preventing large-scale harm.

​

PEAR has also worked to oppose crimes he identifies as the root of human suffering: mass disinformation campaigns, crimes against humanity, psychological conditioning programs targeting populations, exploitation of poverty, engineered dependency cycles, targeted destabilization of communities, suppression of medical breakthroughs, industrial-scale poisoning through harmful consumer products, and global mechanisms of economic control designed to keep entire nations subservient. At the same time, PEAR has advanced neuro-cognitive global monitoring technologies for humanitarian purposes and developed scientific pathways intended to cure diseases that were falsely declared “incurable,” despite the alleged existence of suppressed treatments for decades.

​

PEAR’s principled opposition to the interests of the military-industrial complex, traditional pharmaceutical conglomerates, processed food and beverage industries, alcohol and tobacco sectors, narcotics and chemical dependency markets, behavioral manipulation enterprises, and other profit-driven systems has placed him in direct confrontation with powerful global actors whose influence, by his account, depends on the perpetuation of illness, suffering, dependency, and mass behavioral control.

​

These same institutions—motivated by greed, power consolidation, geopolitical dominance, population management agendas, market preservation, and the maintenance of global hierarchies—have systematically sought to dismantle PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. and destroy its founder - Vitor Mendonça Prado. Their alleged objective has been to prevent the emergence of a technological and ethical framework capable of undermining industries that thrive on war, disease, addiction, misinformation, social fragmentation among others. The mere possibility of a technology capable of restoring cognitive sovereignty, curing chronic and degenerative illnesses, eliminating psychological dependency cycles, and dissolving exploitative socio-economic structures represents—to these entities—an existential threat.

​

Beyond the global institutions and public–private systems previously described, his own heritage—Portuguese, Spanish, Polish, and Russian—has placed him at the center of geopolitical and transnational pressures. Certain actors within these nations, together with powerful corporate interests, have allegedly conspired to target him directly. Among others, the involvement of large multinational enterprises such as those associated with Jorge Paulo Lemann, 3G Capital, and Ambev, which have aligned with political, intelligence, and corporate networks across borders to orchestrate attempts on his life. These coordinated efforts have included multiple episodes of forced institutionalization, targeted poisoning attempts involving rodenticides, insecticides, and other toxic agents, involuntary drugging with illicit substances, covert psychiatric coercion, and engineered circumstances meant to drive him into homelessness and physical vulnerability—efforts as part of a broader systemic campaign to silence or eliminate him.

​

Those responsible underestimated one essential fact: despite being placed repeatedly in conditions resembling extreme poverty or social marginalization, while still possessing significant financial resources, international allies, and support from individuals who held positions within governments, private enterprises, humanitarian sectors, and other institutional spheres. These supporters, were committed to resisting global corruption, gathering evidence, and documenting abuses over decades. This extensive archive of documentation will, at the appropriate moment, be used to pursue civil, criminal, tax, human rights, and crimes-against-humanity accountability against all actors involved, regardless of their rank, nationality, or corporate affiliation.

​

Prado is Jewish descent, and certain individuals (Elon Musk, Mark Zukerberg, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page,  and others) and groups within the global Jewish community—including high-level political leaders such as the current Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu—have contributed to efforts to destroy him (private and professional life) and dismantle PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. These actions have manifested in forms such as poisoning, torture, unlawful detentions, corruption schemes, interference in immigration and consular processes, and other abuses of institutional power. Prado maintains strong alliances with many Jewish individuals and companies (public and private) worldwide who are “upright, ethical, and committed to justice.” These allies, recognize that certain segments of the global Jewish community have been compromised by criminal or unethical elements and such corruption and crimes must be confronted and eliminated.

​

Although Prado and PEAR have long advocated for the protection and empowerment of Arab populations—supporting humanitarian causes, mediating cultural understanding, and promoting stability and justice in Arab regions—some Arab individuals, institutions, and networks have also participated in the hostile actions described throughout this website. These alleged actions mirror the same patterns he attributes to other global actors: coordinated manipulation, targeted violence, institutional sabotage, and attempts to dismantle PEAR’s mission. Nevertheless, Prado and PEAR continues to rely on the loyalty, integrity, and courage of many Arab allies—individuals as defenders of truth, justice, and the wellbeing of their communities. These allies are equally committed to exposing and dismantling criminal factions within their own cultural or national spheres so that genuine peace, ethical leadership, and humane governance can prevail.

​

Between 2018 and 2020, during the first presidential term of Donald J. Trump, Prado was unlawfully imprisoned in San Diego, California, following a coordinated international campaign of persecution. Trump and members of his (and other) administration(s)—together with certain elements of U.S. (and international) intelligence agencies, military personnel, and powerful corporate actors—directly ordered or facilitated his illegal detention. Prior to Prado's imprisonment, he was subjected to a wide range of coercive and harmful acts, including targeted surveillance, involuntary hospitalization, threats, harassment, and deliberate poisoning attempts involving toxic chemicals, illicit drugs, rodenticides, insect venoms, and other contaminants introduced into food, beverages, public environments, and spaces he frequented both in the United States and abroad.

​

​These actions were not limited to governmental institutions. but prominent business figures, including Elon Musk, Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, Jack Ma and others as well as major U.S. media (and international) conglomerates such as Fox News, The New York Times, CNN, CNBC, Rede Globo (from Brazil) and various Hollywood entities and figures, played direct roles within a broader ecosystem that enabled or justified these abuses. The involvement of international governments and private corporations, including, Asia, Africa, Oceania, Americas (North, South and Central), Europe, and names high-profile Brazilian authorities—such as Senator and former federal judge Sérgio Moro and all members of Operation Car Wash (Lava Jato) — appeared, within the broader context of Prado’s long-term investigative trajectory, to be connected to a transnational ecosystem of actors who monitored, followed, or attempted to interfere with his movements across multiple countries.

 

Within this complex environment, Prado and PEAR consistently identified behavioral patterns among certain operatives and peripheral agents (including all individuals referenced throughout this website, each involved in their own specific sets of wrongdoing) that raised profound ethical, institutional, and legal concerns. These patterns included reports, indications, or evidence of improper and criminal conduct, potential involvement with illicit substances like cocaine, suspected extramarital or clandestine activities involving sex workers — including, but not limited to, Hollywood figures, Victoria’s Secret models, Vogue's models, jornalists, Miss Universe candidates, as well as state-level, city-level, and national pageant titleholders, other public personalities from Rede Globo, SBT, TV Bandeirantes, Rede TV, Record (major Brazilian television companies) and other international figures - betraying their partners, such as their wives or husbands, swing parties with partner swapping, signs of systemic corruption and other crimes or influence-driven decision-making. These red flags — observed across multiple jurisdictions — overlapped with periods in which he was being monitored or pursued in international locations such as San Diego, California, USA, London, UK, and others around the world. These are participants, supporters, or beneficiaries of the systemic effort to neutralize him and obstruct the mission of PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. This global coalition was motivated by a shared interest in preventing PEAR’s ethical technologies from exposing systemic exploitation or disrupting existing power structures. These entities and high-profile figures (among all mentioned in this website) contributed, to shaping the public narratives that concealed structural wrongdoing, silenced dissent, and shielded powerful interests from accountability.

​​

This ecosystem extended deep into international political, lesgislative, executive, judicial and private systems. High-profile Brazilian authorities—including multiple past (and current) presidents of Brazil such as Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Dilma Rousseff, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, Michel Temer, José Sarney, Fernando Collor de Mello (and members of their families, network and others), as well as members of Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court including Joaquim Barbosa and others—aligned themselves, knowingly or unknowingly, with a broader multinational effort. Their shared motivation was to prevent Prado, his businesses, friends, partners, PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp.’s ethical technologies from exposing systemic exploitation, interfering with entrenched economic structures, or disrupting long-standing networks of power.

​

During the years Prado lived in various cities in California, this alleged coalition intensified its operations. Alphabet (Google’s parent company), along with major Big Tech firms, private equity groups, venture-capital funds, global financial giants such as BlackRock and Vanguard, and influential Silicon Valley figures reached a coordinated agreement. These groups worked collectively—and in separate subgroups—to discredit him, manipulate public perception, and evade any criminal or civil consequences they feared might emerge from PEAR’s work. This coordination became so extensive that local street signs were replaced, judicial personnel were substituted, prosecutors reassigned, police officers swapped, correctional staff replaced and much more for American and international criminal organizations—some with foreign officials including members of the Brazilian Federal Police, individuals connected to Lava Jato among other international structures from private and public entities. These replacements were not legitimate appointments but strategic infiltrations designed to manufacture an alternate reality around him.

​

These networks contaminated consumer goods—including food, beverages, and everyday items sold in supermarkets, restaurants, bars, and hotels—with toxins, illicit chemicals, or other harmful agents. Even public infrastructure such as air-conditioning systems and municipal water networks in certain regions were compromised. Numerous powerful individuals—including many from the Forbes Top 200 list, executives and donors from elite academic institutions (especially Stanford University and Harvard University), fraternity networks, film directors such as Woody Allen, acting circles in Hollywood, and global cinema corporations—participated in agreements exchanging illicit benefits, political favors, financial gains, promises of influence, or pre-arranged pathways to power. Some political ambitions, such as alleged support for a future Brazilian presidential run by Sérgio Moro, were part of these clandestine exchanges.

​

The governors of California at the time, Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom (2016-2020), were deeply involved in authorizing or permitting these operations within the state in exchange for financial gains, political leverage, or personal advantages. The former British Prime Minister Theresa May, alongside Elon Musk, prominent Hollywood actors including James Bond actor Daniel Craig, and members of royal families such as Prince Harry and Prince William, played roles in various attempts—spanning decades—to undermine, endanger, or neutralize Prado and the mission of PEAR.

​

Certain transnational criminal networks routinely resort to fabricating deaths for a range of strategic and criminal purposes. These staged deaths serve to conceal succession plans, silence inconvenient witnesses, manufacture martyrs or scapegoats, manipulate markets and intellectual property claims, erase tracks of illicit enrichment, and create social or political narratives convenient to powerful actors. The act of faking a death becomes an instrument of governance for those who seek absolute control: it severs legal accountability, restructures inheritance and corporate control lines, and provides a cover under which covert agendas can proceed with reduced scrutiny.

​

In one extraordinary episode Prado reports from his time in the San Francisco and Silicon Valley area in California, USA, Prado personally observed Steve Jobs alive and following him near a Whole Foods market — an encounter Prado describes as surreal and significant. Prado recounts that nearby an iconic Hollywood actor was sitting in a parked car, smoking cannabis, in front of public and private cameras - an image Prado interprets as staged theater intended to distract, normalize, or obscure more consequential movements. Prado presents this sighting not as definitive proof but as a piece of his broader dossier: an anomalous data point that fits a wider pattern of celebrity disappearances, reappearances, and controlled narratives surrounding high-profile figures.

​

​​Apple — as one of the most powerful corporate actors in the global technology ecosystem — figures among the organizations implicated in the orchestration and concealment of a purportedly staged disappearance (fake death) of key public figures like Steve Jobs. This is a broader analysis of motive and capability: Apple’s unparalleled control over intellectual property, product roadmaps, proprietary supply chains, investor relations, and brand narrative could, provide both the incentive and the means to protect strategic innovations, reassign corporate stewardship, or manage succession in ways that avert market disruption and preserve competitive advantage. The corporate calculus in such situations would prioritize continuity of proprietary technologies, stock stability, and the preservation of executive-level secrecy; these priorities, when combined with plausible deniability, media leverage, private security capabilities, and close ties to elite investors and institutional partners, create an environment in which truth can be obscured and inconvenient actors can be sidelined. Whether through deliberate obfuscation, calculated public relations, or the reallocation of legal and financial instruments, a multinational of Apple’s scale could play a central role in controlling narratives about leadership, technology transfer, and legacy, using corporate mechanisms to minimize exposure while maximizing retention of value.

​

Major actors such as Apple, elements within the United States government, and leading Big Tech firms—along with certain allied public–private networks referenced throughout Prado dossier and this website—sought not only to neutralize him through covert pressure but, at times, to physically eliminate him; These entities considered staging a false death for him for the same strategic reasons to the purported disappearance of Steve Jobs. The motive is consistent across cases: protecting proprietary technological advantage, preserving investor value and market stability, extinguishing inconvenient knowledge, preventing legal or regulatory exposure, and managing succession in ways that conceal institutional culpability. These allegations is part of a broader pattern in which powerful organizations deploy a mix of operational capabilities—media control, legal and financial instruments, private security, and informal networks of influence—to silence dissent and obscure inconvenient truths.

​

​

​

​