Elevate Your Mind with Technology

Human thought is the last private frontier. Advanced neurotechnologies—ranging from brain-computer interfaces to non-invasive stimulation and AI-driven neural decoding—can now monitor, infer, and even influence brain activity. Without clear guardrails, these tools can be misused by bad actors (state or private) for covert surveillance, coercion, discrimination, manipulation, and other harms that corrode human dignity and democratic order. That is why PEAR advocates immediate passage of comprehensive Neurocognitive Rights legislation in every country—across the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific, including the EU, USA, UK, Canada, Australia, Brazil, BRICS, and beyond.

 

What these bills establish (shared pillars)

​​

• Fundamental neurorights as law: mental privacy, mental integrity, cognitive liberty, psychological continuity, non-discrimination, and informed consent tailored to neural data and interventions. These rights extend existing constitutional and human-rights guarantees into the neural domain.

• Dedicated oversight: national commissions/regulators and specialized courts/tribunals able to handle complex scientific evidence, ensure rapid, consistent remedies, and build public trust.

• Neurodata protections: strict classification, ownership by the individual, consent pathways, breach duties, deletion rights, and bans on covert collection or sale of neural data.

• Risk-based regulation for medical, consumer, military, and law-enforcement uses, including limits on coercive or surreptitious deployment and standards for safety, efficacy, and auditability.

• Equity & access: fair pathways to therapeutic neurotech; safeguards against neuro-discrimination; culturally aware provisions (e.g., Indigenous data sovereignty in Canada, USA, Brazil, Australia, European Union, and Beyond).

• Innovation with certainty: clear rules that accelerate responsible R&D and investment while deterring abuse—essential for competitiveness and national security.

• International coordination so protections travel with people and data across borders, avoiding regulatory arbitrage.

 

Why urgent global passage matters

​​

• Prevent misuse: Absent explicit neurorights, neurotech can be weaponized for covert monitoring, manipulation, intimidation, and mass profiling. These proposals close those gaps with bright-line prohibitions and enforceable remedies.

• Protect health & truth: Robust consent, medical-grade standards, and specialized adjudication reduce risks of misdiagnosis, fraudulent certifications, or abusive “therapies.”

• Safeguard democracy & markets: Rights-first regulation builds trust, enabling legitimate applications in healthcare, accessibility, education, and productivity—while deterring predatory or clandestine deployments.

 

PEAR’s call to action

 

PEAR urges parliaments, congresses, and regional unions to adopt these frameworks now—harmonizing neurorights, regulation, courts, and data rules—so that every human being retains sovereignty over their own mind. We support aligned legislative tracks in the USA, EU, UK, Canada, Australia, Brazil, BRICS and beyond as immediate baselines for universal adoption and cross-border enforcement.

Editorial note: This statement addresses systemic risks and policy needs. Where potential crimes or abuses are referenced, they are framed as risks or allegations consistent with the legislative justifications cited above; specific determinations belong in competent courts under the proposed specialized regimes.

​

​​

Legislative Blueprints

​

Below are the full legislative blueprints authored by Vitor Mendonça Prado and PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. for Brazil, USA, UK, European Union, Canada and Australia—a complete, jurisdiction-ready toolkit for lawmakers, regulators, judges, prosecutors, health authorities, national security councils, and civil society to adopt, adapt, and enforce. These files consolidate model statutes, regulatory frameworks, specialized-court architecture, evidentiary standards, procurement rules, certification regimes, public-interest exemptions, and bright-line prohibitions against covert or coercive neurotechnology. They specify fundamental neurorights (mental privacy, integrity, cognitive liberty, psychological continuity, and non-discrimination), define neurodata ownership and consent, and set criminal, civil, and administrative liabilities for any actor—public or private—who deploys or enables fragments of advanced neurotechnology for surveillance, manipulation, intimidation, profiling, censorship, behavioral control, or other abuses that can culminate in injury, rare diseases, cancers, falsified medical/psychiatric reports, terrorism, or loss of life.

Each proposal includes implementation playbooks (timelines, agency mandates, audit and red-team testing, incident response, breach notification, whistleblower protections), cross-border cooperation (mutual legal assistance, extradition triggers, sanctions, import/export controls), and equity provisions (access to legitimate therapeutic uses and protections for vulnerable and Indigenous communities). Governments, parliaments, courts, companies, universities, hospitals, and standards bodies are invited to use these texts as baseline law—with immediate emergency moratoria where appropriate—so that nations can halt ongoing harms, deter future ones, and build a verifiable chain of custody for truth, justice, and sovereignty of the human mind.

​

These laws have been recognized worldwide since October 7, 1988, not only by governments, institutions, and societies, but also formally authored and established by Vitor Mendonça Prado and PEAR NeuralTech Quantum Corp. as their creators. From that date onward, they stand as a universal legal and moral foundation—binding in principle and purpose—compelling every nation to uphold and enforce them for the defense of human dignity, justice, and the absolute sovereignty of the human mind.

​

Any and all individuals, entities, or networks—whether governmental, corporate, or private—found to have participated in, facilitated, financed, concealed, or benefited from any form of violation, abuse, or crime falling under the scope of these laws will face full and proportionate consequences. This includes, but is not limited to, criminal prosecution, civil liability, asset seizure, restitution to victims, permanent disqualification from public or corporate office, and international sanctions. Accountability will extend across borders, without immunity or limitation periods, ensuring that no position of power, political influence, financial capacity, or technological control can shield perpetrators from justice. The enforcement of these consequences is not an act of vengeance, but the fulfillment of a universal duty to restore order, protect life, and safeguard the sanctity of the human mind.

​​

Brazil:

• Marco Legal das Tecnologias Neurocognitivas e dos Direitos Cognitivos no Brasil - File HERE​

​

USA:

• Comprehensive US Legislative Proposal - File HERE

​

Euorpean Union:

• European Union Neurocognitive Rights Act. - File HERE

​

United Kingdom:

• United Kingdom Neurocognitive Rights and Advanced Neurotechnology Act - File HERE

​

Canada:

• Canadian Neurocognitive Rights and Advanced Neurotechnology Act - File HERE

​

Australia:

• The Austrlian Neurocognitive Rights and Advanced Neurotechnology Act - File HERE

​​

*These documents are not the final version, due to security, among other reasons. They will be officially released in their complete and final form at the right moment for humanity.

​

​Although not explicitly detailed in the legislative texts presented, it must be clearly stated that capital punishment, life imprisonment, and other grave and irreversible consequences have been, are being, and will continue to be applied to all those involved—directly or indirectly—in the most severe levels of crimes, violations, abuses, and systemic harms addressed by these laws. The degree of each penalty will be determined in strict proportion to the magnitude, intent, and impact of the offense, ensuring that those responsible for acts resulting in mass suffering, loss of life, destruction of health, or the subversion of human freedom face the highest forms of accountability. These measures are not symbolic—they are active, enforceable, and executed with the full weight of universal justice and moral authority, leaving no sanctuary for the most egregious offenders anywhere on Earth.